THE KNOWN UNKNOWN Markets have become reacquainted with volatility over the last 7 months and with a host of omnipresent macroeconomic factors still unresolved, this seems like a good time to discuss tail risk. Throughout my career, I've found that a lot of institutional asset managers rely on Value-at-Risk (VaR) as a risk management tool. Unfortunately, this practice is completely inadequate as VaR cannot protect against against outsized, downside losses - also known as tail risk -... probably because it was never intended to. VaR is merely an interval threshold measurement given an assumed degree of confidence. So if we assume a 95% confidence interval for daily, monthly or annual returns, VaR will tell us the single point at which we would expect 5% of our returns to fall below. Conversely, VaR represents the point where you expect returns to be greater than 95% of the time. VaR does not, however, give the user any information about the shape of a given return distribution or