Skip to main content

Options Trades for the Week of July 20th...


With a slew of earnings scheduled for this week, here are a couple of options trades that can take advantage of catalyst driven volatility while covering your ass at the same time… let the backspreads begin:

1  1) AAPL reports earnings after the market closes on Tuesday and you needn’t look any further to see the breakout possibilities of a sleeping giant stock than last week’s GOOG price action.  

The trade is a call ratio backspread: 

Short 1 July 24thexpiration $127 Call for $4.50
Long 7 July 24thexpiration $136 Calls for $0.85

This trade gives you +79 delta points and has a breakeven price of $138.02.  The downside risk is -$145 in the case of a miss or -$1,033 if the stock finishes at $136/share on Friday the 24th.   

The upside is as follows:

$140payout = 1:1 max risk
$150 payout = 7:1 max risk
$160payout = 13:1 max risk


2  2) GPRO saw its value nearly cut in half between September and March but has clawed its way back to $56… a good quarter for a growth stock that has been through the ringer can definitely lead to some nice price action.  GPRO also reports Tuesday after the close.

          Here’s the trade:

          Short 1 July 24th exp $54 call for $4.2
          Long 7 July 24th exp $62.5 calls for $0.92

The trade gives you +97 delta points and has a breakeven price of $64.39.  The downside is limited to a maximum loss of -$1,063 if GPRO closes Friday at $62.5 and loss of -$224 if the stock finishes the week below $54.  On the upside, the payouts are as follows:

          $66payout = 1:1 max risk
          $70payout =  3.5:1 max risk
          $75payout =  6.5:1 max risk

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Modeling Black-Litterman; Part 1 - Reverse Optimization

  "The 'radical' of one century is the 'conservative' of the next." -Mark Twain In this series, I'm going to explore some of the advances in portfolio management, construction, and modeling since the advent of Harry Markowitz's Nobel Prize winning Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) in 1952. MPT's mean-variance optimization approach shaped theoretical asset allocation models for decades after its introduction.  However, the theory failed to become an accepted industry practice, so we'll explore why that is and what advances have developed in recent years to address the shortcomings of the original model. The Problems with Markowitz For the purpose of illustrating the benefits of diversification in a simple two-asset portfolio, Markowitz's model was a useful tool in producing optimal weights at each level of assumed risk to create efficient portfolios.   However, in reality, investment portfolios are complex and composed of large numbers of holdin...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....