Skip to main content

S&P Testing Support Level...


HOW STRONG IS THIS LEVEL?...

Just six days after last testing the 2,050 support level, the S&P is back to try to crack it again.  Here's a look at the SPY whose corresponding level is roughly 205...


Over the past six months this level has been a rock solid floor for the broad market.  However, the subsequent bounces have been getting progressively weaker. 

I fully expect a technical market correction (as I've written numerous times in this blog) but I'm not 100% certain that the market will breakdown on this test of the support level.  The 50 day moving average is definitely moving lower and it has made all of the requisite 'death crosses' for a bear market but the S&P has a bit of variance to this average.  Whenever there's variance to moving averages there is always a probability of a pullback.

More and more factors are pointing to a broad market selloff and my trade proposals on this blog have been designed to take advantage of that... but don't be surprised if today's selloff doesn't kick off the rout.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....
Post a Comment
Read more

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...
Post a Comment
Read more