Skip to main content

Trading in a High Volatility Environment...

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR, YOU MIGHT GET IT

For anyone who has followed this blog, you know that I've been expecting market volatility to pick up for months and now it has - and then some... furthermore, there's a storm brewing of macro-economic factors that could keep it around for a while.

First, Chinese markets are in the midst of a correction reminiscent of the US tech bubble of 2001... where short-term valuations got way ahead of the long-term potential of an emerging source of growth.  In an apparent and ill-advised measure to save face, the Chinese government has assumed an interventionist role and has attempted to calm markets with asset purchases instead of allowing a natural correction to run its course.  Estimates for the size of the intervention range between $100 and $500 billion US dollars.  When that intervention ultimately ends, more selling is expected and the contagion effects will be felt globally.

Secondly, domestic markets are staring down the first interest rate increase since June of 2006... for perspective, that was more than 2 years before Barack Obama was first elected president.  Last Friday's jobs report showed the nation's unemployment rate has ticked down to 5.1% and the economy continues to add new jobs... albeit not very good ones.  When Janet Yellen convenes the Federal Open Market Committee meeting next week, arguments against raising the short-term borrowing rate off of the 0% floor will be hard to justify.

One person lobbying for pause is IMF Managing Director, Christine Lagarde.  Her arguments against a US interest rate rise are based on prospects that added strength in the US Dollar would hinder global growth and promote price instability.



"THE REAL VOYAGE OF DISCOVERY CONSISTS NOT IN SEEKING NEW LANDSCAPES, BUT IN HAVING NEW EYES."

-Marcel Proust

Regardless of the actions of policy makers, whether as stimulants or depressants, the simple fact is that we are in a new market landscape.  This new environment is a volatile one and that presents a host of challenges and opportunities for options traders.

The New Price of Doing Business:
 
First, let's look at the challenges... namely, the new price of doing business.  Trading in high volatility environments means high implied volatilities which means high options prices.

For example, the implied volatility on the October at-the-money put option for USO is 47%... compare that to a projected volatility of just 15%.  To get a visual comparison of the difference, let's look at a price dispersion for both of these assumptions...

Projected Volatility USO Price Dispersion:



Implied Volatility USO Price Dispersion:


Now in all fairness, the projected period return is -6.51% so a vol of 15% is probably a little lite but the difference is still visually dramatic.

In fairness, we should look other names that haven't been as badly devastated as oil so here are a few more examples of the dichotomies between projected and implied volatilities:
  • SPY October at-the-money put: Implied Vol 25.1%, Projected Vol 6.39%
  • FXI (China ETF) October at-the-money put: Implied Vol 46.2%, Projected Vol 16%
  • GOOG October at-the-money call: Implied Vol 37.2%, Projected Vol 16.4%
The high price of options makes it far more difficult to initiate long-volatility positions.  This is also reflected in convexity calculations for Optimized Positive Convexity positions.  Prior to the market sell-off, positions had convexities upwards of 20x relative to linear assets.  Newer positions (that haven't been posted to this blog) have convexities closer to 6x.  This is attributable to higher options prices and longer durations of trades as I've moved into October expirations.

Carpe Correctio - Seize the Correction

Just as with any systemic price correction, opportunity abounds to seize  undervalued assets.  A few names that have been showing up in my factor model as opportunistic longs are GOOG, AMZN, LMT and P.

This current environment also presents a good time to start initiating short volatility positions.  I'll go into more depth on this topic later.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...