Skip to main content

Trading in a High Volatility Environment...

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR, YOU MIGHT GET IT

For anyone who has followed this blog, you know that I've been expecting market volatility to pick up for months and now it has - and then some... furthermore, there's a storm brewing of macro-economic factors that could keep it around for a while.

First, Chinese markets are in the midst of a correction reminiscent of the US tech bubble of 2001... where short-term valuations got way ahead of the long-term potential of an emerging source of growth.  In an apparent and ill-advised measure to save face, the Chinese government has assumed an interventionist role and has attempted to calm markets with asset purchases instead of allowing a natural correction to run its course.  Estimates for the size of the intervention range between $100 and $500 billion US dollars.  When that intervention ultimately ends, more selling is expected and the contagion effects will be felt globally.

Secondly, domestic markets are staring down the first interest rate increase since June of 2006... for perspective, that was more than 2 years before Barack Obama was first elected president.  Last Friday's jobs report showed the nation's unemployment rate has ticked down to 5.1% and the economy continues to add new jobs... albeit not very good ones.  When Janet Yellen convenes the Federal Open Market Committee meeting next week, arguments against raising the short-term borrowing rate off of the 0% floor will be hard to justify.

One person lobbying for pause is IMF Managing Director, Christine Lagarde.  Her arguments against a US interest rate rise are based on prospects that added strength in the US Dollar would hinder global growth and promote price instability.



"THE REAL VOYAGE OF DISCOVERY CONSISTS NOT IN SEEKING NEW LANDSCAPES, BUT IN HAVING NEW EYES."

-Marcel Proust

Regardless of the actions of policy makers, whether as stimulants or depressants, the simple fact is that we are in a new market landscape.  This new environment is a volatile one and that presents a host of challenges and opportunities for options traders.

The New Price of Doing Business:
 
First, let's look at the challenges... namely, the new price of doing business.  Trading in high volatility environments means high implied volatilities which means high options prices.

For example, the implied volatility on the October at-the-money put option for USO is 47%... compare that to a projected volatility of just 15%.  To get a visual comparison of the difference, let's look at a price dispersion for both of these assumptions...

Projected Volatility USO Price Dispersion:



Implied Volatility USO Price Dispersion:


Now in all fairness, the projected period return is -6.51% so a vol of 15% is probably a little lite but the difference is still visually dramatic.

In fairness, we should look other names that haven't been as badly devastated as oil so here are a few more examples of the dichotomies between projected and implied volatilities:
  • SPY October at-the-money put: Implied Vol 25.1%, Projected Vol 6.39%
  • FXI (China ETF) October at-the-money put: Implied Vol 46.2%, Projected Vol 16%
  • GOOG October at-the-money call: Implied Vol 37.2%, Projected Vol 16.4%
The high price of options makes it far more difficult to initiate long-volatility positions.  This is also reflected in convexity calculations for Optimized Positive Convexity positions.  Prior to the market sell-off, positions had convexities upwards of 20x relative to linear assets.  Newer positions (that haven't been posted to this blog) have convexities closer to 6x.  This is attributable to higher options prices and longer durations of trades as I've moved into October expirations.

Carpe Correctio - Seize the Correction

Just as with any systemic price correction, opportunity abounds to seize  undervalued assets.  A few names that have been showing up in my factor model as opportunistic longs are GOOG, AMZN, LMT and P.

This current environment also presents a good time to start initiating short volatility positions.  I'll go into more depth on this topic later.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                                                1:02:00 Recent Trends in Probabilities of Default:                              1:10:20 Machine Learning:                                                                  1:15:00 Merton Structural Model:                                                        1:19:30 Stochastic Asset Simulation Model:                                        1:27:30 T-Year Merton Model:                

Modeling Black-Litterman; Part 1 - Reverse Optimization

  "The 'radical' of one century is the 'conservative' of the next." -Mark Twain In this series, I'm going to explore some of the advances in portfolio management, construction, and modeling since the advent of Harry Markowitz's Nobel Prize winning Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) in 1952. MPT's mean-variance optimization approach shaped theoretical asset allocation models for decades after its introduction.  However, the theory failed to become an accepted industry practice, so we'll explore why that is and what advances have developed in recent years to address the shortcomings of the original model. The Problems with Markowitz For the purpose of illustrating the benefits of diversification in a simple two-asset portfolio, Markowitz's model was a useful tool in producing optimal weights at each level of assumed risk to create efficient portfolios.   However, in reality, investment portfolios are complex and composed of large numbers of holdin

Evidence the SPY is Overbought...

 A quick note on the recent market rally here of late.  It's plain to see the markets have been on a tear for the month of June (and going back into May for the QQQ) as the SPY closed today at its highest level in almost fourteen months. If we start to look at the historical levels, however, it appears the SPY may be overbought in the short-run and susceptible to a mean-reverting pattern. Here's the daily chart of the SPY as of today's (6/15/23) close... When looking at the distance between the closing price and the 50-day moving average (illustrated by the yellow bar), we're noticing a large gap... this can be measured by a statistic I developed which I casually refer to as "variance"... or the distance between current prices and their respective moving averages. Historically, throughout the life of the SPY (which debuted in January of '93), the variance over the 50-day moving average has peaked at a reading of 3.20... today's reading posts up at 2.49