Skip to main content

Volatility - Version 3.0



MARKETS ARE SET UP FOR ANOTHER FALL

 

Equity markets are setting up for their third bout of pronounced volatility in the past ten months as a confluence of factors form like storm clouds on the horizon.  Global macroeconomic concerns, domestic rate expectations and bearish technical indicators have been going concerns for several months; and while they're certainly not mutually exclusive, all three factors are now flashing red at the same time!


CHINA


The issue of China's slowing growth and mounting debt are nothing new...

http://tancockstradingblog.blogspot.com/2016/05/is-china-next-japan-continuing-case.html

However, China related stocks and ETFs had enjoyed a small relief rally... until recently that is.  Anything associated with the country is under fire again and not even huge investments from Apple can seem to save them.


THE DOLLAR


Similar to Chinese stocks, the dollar had recently reversed its own longer trend... it just so happened to be a bullish one.  However, the dollar's technical pattern has transitioned from a bearish breakdown, to a low basing consolidation and today it moved into a bullish breakout:


A stronger dollar is a direct threat to natural resources; namely, oil, which has enjoyed a respite from a long and steep run of free falling prices.  Renewed pressure amid energy related stocks would be yet another weight on a market that is struggling just to tread water.

http://tancockstradingblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/its-all-about-tubmans.html


LOWER HIGHS AND LOWER LOWS


Lastly, the market's long-term technical weakness is converging with short-term bearish signals.  Following last August's drop, the market failed to eclipse its' previous high (lower high).  It then proceeded to experience a second round of volatility in January where the lows breached the base put in by the August rout (lower low).  Similarly to last summer's selloff, January's volatility was also followed by a relief rally.  However, this past rally also failed to eclipse the previous high (lower high).


Now, the S&P is in its own breakdown pattern as prices begin to push below recent support levels.



Of course this does not mean that another systemic correction is guaranteed, but these signals certainly point to the increased likelihood of the market having another round of pressured selling in the near future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...