Skip to main content

The Post Election Rally - A Case Study in Directional Volatility

A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD

Over the past 28 days following the US Presidential election, the S&P has been on a tear returning more than 6% in a little more than 5 weeks time. 

For the sake of context, the index returned just over 1.5% for the one year prior to the election while the 28 day post-election rally is in the 90th percentile of returns over the same time period since the inception of the S&P 500 (the orange line in the histogram represents the most recent 28 day performance).


It is important to note that not all rallies are created equal, however.  The majority of 28 day return distributions to the right of our current mark came on the heels of downside volatility when prices are subject to wild fluctuations in both directions.  That has not been the case in the fall of 2016 though as this rally is almost a pure breakout following an unexpected outcome in the election that is expected to favor corporate profitability.

Typically, increases in the price of volatility are associated with bear markets - as prices move lower with greater speed, traders look to insure positions with derivatives whose own prices rise as a function of increased demand and rising levels of implied (or expected) volatility.  Bull markets, on the other hand, tend to play out over a longer cycle; as the saying goes - fear is a greater motivation than greed.  With the longer bull market cycle, demand spikes for options or rapid rises in expected volatility are not as common so prices tend to stay low. 

Again, this rally is different.  The price of volatility - while not spiking - has seen increases on days when the market is making new highs. 

In looking at the SPY 1 week at-the-money put options, the historical volatility for this contract is typically south of 10%; however, this morning the implied volatility was pricing at more than 15%... a 50% premium to historical vol!  Also interesting has been the performance of the VIX.  On December 7th, for example, the S&P rallied close 1.3% for the day; typically, this would not be a cause for a rise in volatility but the VIX actually rose more than 3.5% that day.

What this indicates to me is that markets are pricing in an extended period of price fluctuations and not just to the downside.  The post-election rally has plenty of steam still and is not showing any technical signs of slowing down.  However, I personally believe the market is also pricing in an increased headline risk premium.  Given the unorthodox nature of this transition in political power, a single headline could wildly disrupt markets too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...