Skip to main content

Technical Risk Factors Strengthen...

UPGRADED TO A CATEGORY 2 STORM WARNING

Given the recent frenzy of tropical storms that ravaged Texas, Florida and Puerto Rico, the current dynamics of equity markets are drawing a corollary to natural destructive forces.  Roughly 3 weeks ago, I wrote of the appearance of short-term volatility risk signals...

http://tancockstradingblog.blogspot.com/2017/11/technicals-highlight-short-term.html

Following that post, markets did experience a brief round of volatility as the VIX spiked close to 60% in the 8 days of trading that followed.  However, in the scheme of things, the move was somewhat muted as broader indices suffered from the albatross of lateral movement in the tech sector.  After churning through high variance, techs resumed their march higher in the subsequent 8 days of trading and it seemed as though the storm had passed.

This market action was akin to a category 1 hurricane warning and getting a tropical depression... not as bad as it could have been but there was definitely some clean up required.

I don't use this metaphor to make light of the tragic circumstances that continue to affect so many Americans, but to give some context to our current situation.

After today's market action, volatility risk signals are now officially flashing red as technical factors are signaling greater systemic risk.  On the surface, things weren't that bad... the S&P was down a mere 6 basis points and fresh off another break-out session yesterday.

However, sector performance was markedly mixed today as financials got a boost from the prospects of a December interest rate hike while tech stocks got smacked.  The Technology ETF, XLK was down more than 2% today and it - and 3 of the big 4 (AAPL, AMZN, FB, MSFT) plus GOOG - closed below support in a newly minted bearish technical pattern with the next support level more than another 2% and 3 ATRs down.

Given the strength of the tech sector on the broader market, I would say that systemic risk has been upgraded to a category 2 level... the only thing that remains to be seen is if it makes landfall.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Modeling Black-Litterman; Part 1 - Reverse Optimization

  "The 'radical' of one century is the 'conservative' of the next." -Mark Twain In this series, I'm going to explore some of the advances in portfolio management, construction, and modeling since the advent of Harry Markowitz's Nobel Prize winning Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) in 1952. MPT's mean-variance optimization approach shaped theoretical asset allocation models for decades after its introduction.  However, the theory failed to become an accepted industry practice, so we'll explore why that is and what advances have developed in recent years to address the shortcomings of the original model. The Problems with Markowitz For the purpose of illustrating the benefits of diversification in a simple two-asset portfolio, Markowitz's model was a useful tool in producing optimal weights at each level of assumed risk to create efficient portfolios.   However, in reality, investment portfolios are complex and composed of large numbers of holdin...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....