Skip to main content

Early Review on Positive Convexity Trading...

"INNOVATION IS TAKING TWO THINGS THAT ALREADY EXIST AND PUTTING THEM TOGETHER IN A NEW WAY."

-Tom Freston

It's been a couple of weeks since I built out the optimization model and now that market volatility has finally arrived - as I have been predicting - we can take a good look at how it has performed.

The optimization model was built out of a curiosity I had about how to best structure trades and it produced a bit of an unexpected result...

http://tancockstradingblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/optimizing-equity-returns-using.html

http://tancockstradingblog.blogspot.com/2015/08/follow-up-on-qihu-short-trade.html


First, let's review how some of the original trades - that used options as protective overlays - posted on here have performed.



  • 6 Trades; 4 winners & 2 losers
  • Average return of positive 0.9%
  • Average position life of 20.8 market days
  • Average winning trade is up 6.9% on underlying moves of 9.8%
  • Average losing trade is -11% on underlying moves of 14.9%

Now, let's look at the optimized trades:

  • 3 Trades; 2 winners and 1 loser
  • Average return of positive 12.9%
  • Average position life of 5.7 days
  • Average winning trade is up 21.2% on underlying moves of 11.9%
  • Losing trade is -3.8% on underlying move of 5.4%

Wow.  That's a huge difference.  Looking at the results, the convexity benefits are clear and undeniable.

It's important to note that this is an extremely small sample size and the recent market volatility has certainly been tailor made for an options portfolio.  However, I think it would be a mistake to dismiss the results on these premises because the 'traditional' trades have had the same volatility and the results just don't stack up.

 Obviously, I'm going to continue to track this but the initial results are very promising.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                                                1:02:00 Recent Trends in Probabilities of Default:                              1:10:20 Machine Learning:                                                                  1:15:00 Merton Structural Model:                                                        1:19:30 Stochastic Asset Simulation Model:                                        1:27:30 T-Year Merton Model:                
Post a Comment
Read more

Modeling Black-Litterman; Part 1 - Reverse Optimization

  "The 'radical' of one century is the 'conservative' of the next." -Mark Twain In this series, I'm going to explore some of the advances in portfolio management, construction, and modeling since the advent of Harry Markowitz's Nobel Prize winning Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) in 1952. MPT's mean-variance optimization approach shaped theoretical asset allocation models for decades after its introduction.  However, the theory failed to become an accepted industry practice, so we'll explore why that is and what advances have developed in recent years to address the shortcomings of the original model. The Problems with Markowitz For the purpose of illustrating the benefits of diversification in a simple two-asset portfolio, Markowitz's model was a useful tool in producing optimal weights at each level of assumed risk to create efficient portfolios.   However, in reality, investment portfolios are complex and composed of large numbers of holdin
Post a Comment
Read more

Evidence the SPY is Overbought...

 A quick note on the recent market rally here of late.  It's plain to see the markets have been on a tear for the month of June (and going back into May for the QQQ) as the SPY closed today at its highest level in almost fourteen months. If we start to look at the historical levels, however, it appears the SPY may be overbought in the short-run and susceptible to a mean-reverting pattern. Here's the daily chart of the SPY as of today's (6/15/23) close... When looking at the distance between the closing price and the 50-day moving average (illustrated by the yellow bar), we're noticing a large gap... this can be measured by a statistic I developed which I casually refer to as "variance"... or the distance between current prices and their respective moving averages. Historically, throughout the life of the SPY (which debuted in January of '93), the variance over the 50-day moving average has peaked at a reading of 3.20... today's reading posts up at 2.49
Post a Comment
Read more