Skip to main content

The Great Reversion, Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Volatility...

"IF YOU THINK THIS IS OVER THEN YOU'RE WRONG"

Separator, Radiohead


Welcome volatility, we've been expecting you!

The markets have gotten their first taste of volatility since 2011 but these moves we've seen these past few days felt more like this time of year in 2008.  1,000 point swings on the Dow and the VIX spiking up to 45+... it's enough to make a grown man cry... and that likely happened too.

For anyone who has followed this blog, this all comes as no surprise... the only surprising thing was how long it took to finally get here.

Where we're at now, from a technical standpoint anyway, is in a pattern I call the 'reversion trade.'  When prices exhibit large variances from their moving averages, they will almost always do so with spikes in momentum factors.  Once those momentum factors settle down, prices have a tendency to revert back toward their moving averages.

A large variance for an index ETF like the SPY would be a reading of 2.00... the variance on Monday was over 10.  Now that the negative momentum had ebbed, we saw a big reversion as indices recouped almost 4% today alone.

This does not mean that the selling is necessarily over, however.  We are still in the early stages of bearish technical patterns which have a tendency to be accompanied by more bouts of volatility.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...