Skip to main content

The Week Ahead; Looking Forward at Backwardation...

"IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT... AND I FEEL FINE"

It's the End of the World As We Know It, R.E.M.


The  moments in history when our view of the world has changed suddenly and dramatically are so etched into conscience that they are recalled solely by date: September 11th, November 22nd, December 7th.

Markets are dynamic and constantly changing and sometimes that change is dramatic and can be recalled by a year: 1929, 2001 or 2008.  However, unlike moments in history where the gravity and significance of an event is immediately apparent, market events tend to distill more slowly until a collective consensus is reached that leads to a watershed move.

The last couple of weeks, domestic markets have begun to react to the stress that's been rocking Asian markets for months.  Now, there is evidence that there has been a shift in thinking about market risk going forward.  I've previously written about the scenario known as 'contango' where docile volatility expectations lead to an erosion in the price of volatility ETFs.  The volatility market has been in a general state of contango for well over a year (and arguably much longer).

http://tancockstradingblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/buying-volatility-to-hedge-against.html

Friday however, we saw evidence of the opposite effect known as 'backwardation.'  Backwardation occurs when the implied volatility of S&P options is more expensive in the front month than the rollover month.  Therefore, the VIX futures are sold high at the end of the current month and bought for a cheaper price for the subsequent month.  On Friday, the SPY closed the day mostly unchanged but volatility ETFs were higher on the day.. see the VXX, VIXY & UVXY.

I read this to mean that there is an expectation of more volatility in the days ahead especially if Chinese markets continue to deteriorate to the point where they will be viewed differently than they were just a few months ago from a historical perspective.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...