Skip to main content

Low Bases, Death Crosses and the Disappearance of Market Bulls

WHAT'S GOING ON

Last week, I revisited the subject of the fill gap pattern; when the price of a stock moves into a range formed by a large gap between two respective moving averages, typically the 20 and 50 days.  What tends to happen is the stock (or index in this case) will use the respective averages as support and resistance levels and consolidate inside of the range before breaking out in its next move.  It looked as if the S&P was entering a gap last week when the index breached the falling 20 day moving average on a strong up move.  However, subsequent price action pushed prices back outside of the range and instead of consolidating, the index is now in a low basing pattern and testing its long-term support level.



THE DEATH CROSS; OMEN OF THINGS TO COME OR A DAY LATE AND A DOLLAR SHORT?

There's another market phenomenon that has gone overlooked recently and that was the crossing of the 50 day moving average below the 100 day... otherwise known as the death cross.  Technicians point to death crosses as omens of impending spikes in market volatility.  Last August's dramatic market move and volatility spike were consequently preceded by a death cross. 

Death Cross
 
Strangely enough, this year's price action has not been accompanied by a volatility spike, as yet, even though the same levels are now being tested. 

6 Month Vol Chart:


It is also interesting to note that volatility has now moved into a breakout pattern (trading above its moving averages with the gap between the 20 and 50 days widening).

Volatility Breaking Out:


WHERE ARE THE BULLS?

Without a reemergence of market bulls, the current set of factors could spell another round of panicked selling.  Watch the 185 level on the SPY (roughly 1,860 on the SPX); if it is breached, things could go south fast.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...