Skip to main content

"60% of the Time, It Works Every Time"



THE RIGHT CALL AT THE WRONG TIME

A few weeks back, I predicted that we would see an increase in short term market volatility...

http://tancockstradingblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/technical-indicators-point-to-more.html

While that forecast did not exactly come to fruition at the time, the market action we've seen over the past couple of days is the manifestation of the technical pattern that lead to that call.

Here's the chart of the SPY to illustrate the point:


The red arrow signifies the chart pattern at the time of the previous call and the circle points to where we're at as of the close today (Friday, 4/29).  This is the infamous (to me anyways) fill gap pattern, where prices have a tendency to consolidate inside of the 20/50 day moving average range before finding direction and breaking out again.

http://tancockstradingblog.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-fill-gap-pattern.html

If the pattern holds true, we can expect to see the broad market consolidate inside of this range before it makes its next move higher or lower.


THE MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION

Assuming the pattern does hold and the market consolidates, the larger question becomes 'what direction will equities take next?'  Recent history suggests that we could see another round of market volatility, similar to that of August and January, if the markets were to break lower.  Looking at a longer duration chart, we can see the markets have been making progressively lower lows and lower highs:


This is an ominous trend and it could be enough for markets to come under significant duress if recent support levels are broken.

On the other hand, the macroeconomic environment - in regards to equity markets anyway - is more favorable today than it was in either January or August.  Namely, the depreciation in the dollar has helped to boost commodity prices and it creates a favorable environment for future corporate earnings (which have been less than inspiring for Q1).

Regardless of reasons for optimism, there continues to be the elephant in the room in the form of the health of the Chinese economy.  Should the bearish predictions for China come to fruition (some people are calling China a giant Ponzi scheme) then we would be facing a full blown global economic event and all bets would be off... correlations will go to 1 and there will be pain on the streets across the globe circa 2008.  China related stocks and ETFs (WYNN, LVS, FXI, EWH) are showing signs of renewed stress after a brief recovery... this could just be market beta or it could be the canary in the coal mine.

Either way, I believe the next few weeks will be a significant indicator of how the market will perform for the rest of the year.  If support levels hold, a lower dollar could propel markets to make new highs amid dampening volatility.  To me, the key support levels to watch over the next few weeks are the 50-day moving average and the previous low of 1830 on the S&P.  If these support levels are broken, brace yourselves because we could be in for a very bumpy ride.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....
Post a Comment
Read more

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...
Post a Comment
Read more