Skip to main content

A Vector of No Magnitude

MAGNITUDE & DIRECTION

In mathematics, systems of linear equations are used to construct complex spans that can shift across multiple dimensions.  In their most basic form, each construct is made up of a series of vectors which are basically line segments.  A vector, by definition, has two components - magnitude and direction.

On Friday, the S&P closed down for the day - which by itself is not particularly noteworthy, except for the fact that it had also closed down in each of the previous 8 days as well.  This was the first time this has happened since 1980... a somewhat historic move in terms of duration.

Since September, I've noted on this blog that the market was signaling an increased likelihood of a correction so the direction of the move comes as no surprise.  What has been surprising, however, is the magnitude of a move breaking below support levels... or should I say, the lack thereof.

Going back to August of last year, the market has had two noteworthy corrections prior to this one - three if you count the fallout from Brexit which was more of an unforeseen systemic shock; but both of the technical corrections displayed the typical eruptions of volatility and volume that are associated with down moves.

For the sake of context, I'm defining a 'correction' as a breakout to the downside (breakdown) below levels of support with widening negative gaps in moving averages.

Here's the August 2015 move...

Here's last January's move...


By contrast, here's the S&P's most recent breakdown...

The differences are plain to see.

Another interesting part of the market's activity over the last couple of weeks has been the US Dollar.  The greenback has lost its mojo after previously breaking out to new highs only to give it all back in spite of the Fed giving a wink and a nod to another December rate hike.  A weakening dollar is usually a welcome sign by equities but not so in this environment.

The only thing to conclude here is that the market is simply gearing up for the US Presidential election and is pricing in the possibility of what could be viewed as an unfavorable outcome.  The price of vol has spiked ahead of Tuesday's decision so it will be interesting to see how things play out come Wednesday.

In linear algebra, the magnitude - and even direction - of a vector can be changed by applying what's known as a scalar multiplier.  In the context of domestic equity markets, the election appears to be the scalar multiple that will determine whether the magnitude and direction of this vector is augmented or reversed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...