Skip to main content

WYNN & LVS Breakout and are Poised to Renew Rallies

BORN TO RUN

"Together we could break this trap... We'll run till we drop, baby we'll never go back..."
-Born to Run, Bruce Springsteen

In the 1975 American classic 'Born to Run', Bruce Springsteen sings of kindred spirits longing to escape their shackles and "get to that place (they) really want to go."

Some 40+ years later, we are seeing another pair of kindred spirits trying to break out from a malaise of technical mediocrity in search of their collective potential.  Only differences are, this pair isn't American or beleaguered vagabonds; rather, WYNN and LVS are the manifestation of Asia's growing economic and geopolitical influence combined with a love of risk-taking.

The pair of gaming companies have experienced tremendous growth over the course of the past decade - especially WYNN - but neither have fully recovered from the slide in Asian stocks in 2015.  That may be about to change.

Looking at the long-term chart of WYNN (1 week intervals dating back to '09), we can see that it's recovered roughly half of its loss:


However, its recent history (this is a daily interval chart) shows a prolonged lateral move inside a $130-$150 range:


LVS has displayed strikingly similar technical patterns:

What's technically intriguing about these charts are the most recent break-outs coming on the heels of a consolidation, sustained periods above support levels and positive moving averages. 

However, it should be noted that geopolitical tensions in the East remain high and China is still facing develeraging concerns; so some form of put protection might not be the worst idea for what otherwise appear to be bullish opportunities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Modeling Black-Litterman; Part 1 - Reverse Optimization

  "The 'radical' of one century is the 'conservative' of the next." -Mark Twain In this series, I'm going to explore some of the advances in portfolio management, construction, and modeling since the advent of Harry Markowitz's Nobel Prize winning Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) in 1952. MPT's mean-variance optimization approach shaped theoretical asset allocation models for decades after its introduction.  However, the theory failed to become an accepted industry practice, so we'll explore why that is and what advances have developed in recent years to address the shortcomings of the original model. The Problems with Markowitz For the purpose of illustrating the benefits of diversification in a simple two-asset portfolio, Markowitz's model was a useful tool in producing optimal weights at each level of assumed risk to create efficient portfolios.   However, in reality, investment portfolios are complex and composed of large numbers of holdin...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....