Skip to main content

The Last Line of Defense...

BACKSTOPPED

The NHL playoffs are in full swing and at this time of year a hot goaltender is often the difference between winning and losing. Hockey's history is a cautionary tale for any highly favored team to not overlook an opponent with a hot goalie: Jim Craig in the 1980 Olympics, Mike Richter in the 1996 World Cup, Ryan Miller in the 2010 Olympics (very nearly won), Jonathan Quick in the 2012 Stanley Cup playoffs.

In hockey, the goalie backstops the team and is the last line of defense against an aggressive opposition.

In today's equity market, the last line of defense against an aggressive breakdown has been the S&P's 200 day moving average.  Over the course of the past 29 trading days, the support level has backstopped falling markets a total of 8 times - today included.


But what happens if this level fails to hold the next wave of selling?  When tested a few weeks back, the market had already expended a lot of energy just to get to that point as price level variances from SMAs were large.  Now, however, market technicals are far more ominous:
  • The market has been consolidating energy in a downward trend
  • The 20, 50 and 100 day trends are all negative 
  • The 50 day moving average has crossed below the 100 day - known as a 'death cross'  
  • The 20 day average had a negative inflection point two days ago
  • Price variances from their 20 and 50 day moving averages are low
A break below the 200 day moving average at this point could lead to the market unleashing all of this coiled up energy in a wave of selling.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Modeling Credit Risk...

     Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk.  If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch      Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins:                                                                0:58:00 Logistic Regression:                                     ...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at.  It worked immediately.  By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me.  It was like discovering a new power.  What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor.  However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications.  The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity.  Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...