Tech Mean Reversion 3.0?

HISTORICALLY OVEREXTENDED

For anyone who followed the previous blog, you're familiar with the concept of 'Market Variance.' It's used to describe situations where price actions have moved away from a trailing average in a significant way.

https://bluehorseshoefinance.blogspot.com/2018/11/market-data-analytics-variance-revisited.html

Typically, my writing has focused on one day candle charts but a market variance of historic proportions has emerged in the Nasdaq monthly chart that is certainly worth taking note of.

Here's a historical Nasdaq 100 chart with monthly candles:

The blue line in the chart represents the 20 period simple moving average (will now be referred to as the 20 SMA). As of this writing, the 20 SMA is at 8927 while the Nasdaq current price is 11665... a huge nominal difference to say the least.

The technical indicator previously cited, Market Variance, was built to quantify the extent to which a price varies from some appreciable mean relative to historical dispersions.

For the record, I fully realize this is not the technical definition of 'variance', but rather an appropriation made for illustration.

At the end of September, the Nasdaq's monthly candle 'variance' to the 20 SMA was 2.83. For context, the fourth quartile variance for the Nasdaq monthly candle data set is 1.792.

For all instances where the adjusted closing price is above the 50 SMA, September's historical variance of 2.83 is inside the 90th percentile for the data set which dates back to 1993.

More interestingly, the August closing variance of 3.99 was the fourth largest in the data set, only to be outdone by variance readings leading up to the dotcom crash of 2000.

WHY THIS MATTERS

To illustrate why this matters, let's consider a common automated trading strategy, the Mean Reversion. Typically, mean reverting algorithms use Bollinger Bands to determine when a market is overbought or oversold.

Going back to the monthly bar chart, we see the NDX is currently well outside of its 2 upside standard deviation band and is challenging the limits of its 3 upside standard deviation band...

...this pattern was repeated in late 1999/early 2000 and October, 2007. These same time periods also happen to show up on our historical rankings of the 'Variance' statistic.

One can only assume that every mean reversion algorithm trading the monthly Nasdaq 100 is flashing a huge giant red sell signal right now.

Comments

Modeling Credit Risk...

Here's a link to a presentation I gave back in August on modeling credit risk. If anyone would like a copy of the slides, go ahead and drop me a line... https://www.gotostage.com/channel/39b3bd2dd467480a8200e7468c765143/recording/37684fe4e655449f9b473ec796241567/watch Timeline of the presentation: Presentation Begins: 0:58:00 Logistic Regression: ...

Variable Types for Principal Component & Factor Modeling

TRANSFORMING RAW DATA INTO INSIGHT & ACTIONABLE INFORMATION After reading the book Moneyball for the first time, I built a factor model in hopes of finding a way to finally be competitive in my fantasy baseball league - which I had consistently been terrible at. It worked immediately. By taking raw data and turning it into actionable information, I was able to solve a problem that had long perplexed me. It was like discovering a new power. What else could I do with this? Today, I build models for everything and have come a long way since that first simple spreadsheet but still use a lot of the same concepts. To build a traditional factor model, you would regress a dependent variable against a series of independent variables and use the resulting beta coefficients as the factor weights... assuming your resulting r-squared and t-test showed a meaningful relationship of course. Variables typically fall into one of two categories... continuous or dichotomous....

Convexity as a Technical Indicator - Applications of the Second Derivative...

WHAT'S IN A NAME? In investment parlance, the term 'convexity' is typically reserved for the topic of fixed income risk; especially in regards to debt with embedded optionality where negative convexity is a prominent pricing factor. However, it is important to recall that 'convexity' (or 'concavity', for that matter) is a mathematical measurement used to describe the second derivative of a continuous, nonlinear function on an interval. The issue with confining the term to a single connotation is that - for better or worse - investment tools have become increasingly nonlinear since the days of the 60/40 model and convexity is present in a number of applications. The extent to which it has been circumscribed to a single asset class is evident in equity option jargon where the second derivative of the pricing function is called 'gamma' instead of convexity. Of course, the argument could be made that the principle purpose of option vernacular is to c...

Blue Horseshoe Loves This Finance Blog

Search This Blog